Company Response
Amy Perez from
GT Auto Transport LLC Submitted this response.
Response Date: 11/1/2007 5:46:00 PM
I SPOKE WITH THIS CUSTOMER MANY TIMES REGARDING THE DAMAGE DONE TO THE VEHICLE AND WHEN I SPOKE WITH THE CARRIER HE SAID THE DAMAGE WAS PRE-EXISTING... WHEN CUSTOMERS PLACE ORDER WITH ME I TELL THEM THAT IF THEY NOTICE ANYTHING THAT WAS NOT ALREADY THERE THEY WOULD HAVE TO PUT IT ON THE BILL OF LADING (INSPECTION CHECK) WHEN THEY RECEIVE THE VEHICLE... THIS PART IS THE CUSTOMERS JOB AND UNFORTUNATELY HE DID NOT DO THAT. SO WHEN I SPOKE WITH HIM THE FIRST TIME I ADVISED EVEN IF THE CARRIER HAD DAMAGED THE VEHICLE IF YOU DO NOT NOTE IT ON THE BOL YOU WILL HAVE NOT RECOURSE... IT HAS TO BE NOTED AND BOTH HIM AND MATSON WOULD HAVE NEEDED TO SIGN OFF ON IT. BUT AS I STATED BEFORE THE CARRIER THAT LOADED THE VEHICLE IN NJ SAID THE DAMAGE/ SPRAY JOB WAS ALREADY THERE BEFORE THEY PICKED IT UP... IF SOMETIME EVER HAPPENED TO MY CUSTOMERS VEHICLE AND IT WAS THE CARRIERS FAULT OF COURSE I WOULD FOLLOW UP WITH IT AND DO EVERYTHING I COULD TO GET IT SOLVED. I PUT MYSELF IN MY CUSTOMERS SHOES AND I WOULD NOT WANT THAT TO HAPPEN TO ME.